Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Fonteum · Tools

MIPS Score Lookup by Physician

Search CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS scores by physician name, NPI, or specialty. Source-provenanced to the CMS QPP PY2023 federal dataset. Free, no signup.

540K+ clinicians·CMS QPP PY2023·Updated quarterly

What this tool covers

Clinicians covered
540K+
PY2023 individual participants
Source
CMS QPP
qpp.cms.gov — federal public domain
Update cadence
Quarterly
Annual QPP release, quarterly ingest
Methodology
cms-qpp/v1
Pinned, audit-traceable

The CMS Quality Payment Program publishes individual clinician MIPS scores annually. Each record includes the final composite score (0–100), component scores for Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Promoting Interoperability, and the resulting Medicare payment adjustment percentage. Fonteum adds field-level provenance — source identifier, performance year, ingest timestamp — so every record is traceable to its CMS origin.

Score bands

Exceptional
75–100
Above Average
60–74.99
Met Threshold
45–59.99
Below Threshold
0–44.99

Thresholds reflect CMS QPP PY2023 performance category structure.

Frequently asked questions

What is a MIPS score?
MIPS stands for Merit-based Incentive Payment System, part of the CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP). Eligible clinicians receive a composite score from 0 to 100 based on four performance categories: Quality (30%), Cost (30%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Promoting Interoperability (25%). The score determines a Medicare payment adjustment applied two years later — higher scores earn positive adjustments; lower scores receive negative adjustments.
How do I look up a physician's MIPS score by name?
Enter the physician's first or last name in the Physician Name tab. Fonteum searches the CMS NPPES registry to find matching providers and overlays their MIPS scores from the CMS Quality Payment Program PY2023 dataset. For an exact match, use the NPI tab with the provider's 10-digit National Provider Identifier. For specialty-wide searches, use the Specialty tab and enter a specialty description such as 'Internal Medicine' or 'Family Practice'.
What do the MIPS score bands mean — Exceptional, Above Average, Met Threshold, Below Threshold?
Fonteum classifies MIPS final scores into four bands based on CMS QPP performance thresholds. Exceptional (75+): clinician performance significantly above the national average, typically qualifies for exceptional performance bonus payments. Above Average (60–74.99): above the performance threshold with a positive payment adjustment. Met Threshold (45–59.99): meets the minimum performance threshold with a minimal positive adjustment. Below Threshold (below 45): performance below the minimum threshold; subject to a negative payment adjustment.
Why might a physician have no MIPS score?
Not all clinicians participate in MIPS. A physician may not have a MIPS score because: (1) they are not a MIPS-eligible clinician type; (2) they qualified for an exception — small practice, extreme hardship, low-volume threshold; (3) they participate in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (AAPM) instead of MIPS; or (4) they opted out of Medicare entirely. Fonteum shows the most recent performance year data available in the CMS QPP dataset.

Source & limitations

Data source: CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) — MIPS Individual Clinician Performance Data, published annually by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at qpp.cms.gov. Federal public domain (US-Government-Works). Provider name and specialty sourced from the CMS NPPES public registry in real-time.

Limitations: MIPS scores reflect individual clinician performance for PY2023 only. Not all eligible clinicians are included — those with low Medicare volume, small-practice exceptions, or extreme hardship exceptions may be absent. Group practice scores are tracked separately and not shown here. Do not use for credentialing, contracting, or regulatory decisions without verifying at the official CMS QPP portal.

Free to cite with attribution to Fonteum Research and a link to this tool.

NPI Provider Lookup → · All free tools →

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
47reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures