Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Research/Tools/Access-gap lookup
FREE TOOL · NO SIGNUP

Provider Access Gap Lookup

Type a state or ZIP plus a medical specialty. Get the per-100,000 provider density figure with national percentile, three comparable states, and a citeable result block. CMS NPPES + U.S. Census, fully sourced. Free.

Try a high-volume example

Pre-rendered county pages for the eight most-populous U.S. counties × Dermatologists:

  • Los Angeles County, CA
  • Cook County, IL
  • Harris County, TX
  • Maricopa County, AZ
  • San Diego County, CA
  • Orange County, CA
  • Miami-Dade County, FL
  • Dallas County, TX

How it works

  1. For each specialty, Fonteum runs a daily snapshot of the public CMS NPPES NPI Registry, filtering to the relevant taxonomy codes.
  2. State counts are divided by U.S. Census Bureau 2024-vintage population estimates to get density per 100,000 residents.
  3. Each state is ranked by density. The percentile shown is the queried state's position within the 51-jurisdiction ranking (50 states + DC).
  4. For ZIP and county queries, the result surfaces state-level density with the geographic context preserved — NPPES doesn't publish a county-level field of practice in its public API.

Full methodology →

Specialties covered

  • Dermatologists
  • Psychiatrists
  • Cardiologists
  • OB-GYNs
  • Pediatricians
  • Neurologists
  • Oncologists
  • Orthopedic surgeons
  • Ophthalmologists
  • Gastroenterologists
  • Urologists
  • Otolaryngologists (ENT)
  • Chiropractors
  • Plastic surgeons

Each specialty links to its parent Fonteum Research study with the full per-state dataset, methodology, and Limitations.

Source & limitations

Source: U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services NPI Registry (NPPES) public API + U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP), 2024 vintage. Snapshot date is published on every result page.

This tool measures density, not access. Drive time, appointment availability, insurance acceptance, and wait times are not modeled. The full Limitations doctrine is repeated on every result page.

Free to cite with attribution to Fonteum Research and a link to this tool.

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
47reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures