Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Side-by-Side Comparison

Komodo Health vs Trella Health: Side-by-Side Comparison

Komodo Health and Trella Health both use claims data but at different scope. Komodo Health covers the broad healthcare market with a 325M-patient claims graph. Trella Health focuses specifically on the post-acute care market — home health, hospice, SNFs — providing claims analytics to the organizations and vendors in that segment.

Dimension by dimension

Komodo Health vs Trella Health, across 8 dimensions

DimensionKomodo HealthTrella Health
Data typeBroad healthcare claims graph — 325M+ patients across all care settingsPost-acute claims analytics — home health, hospice, SNF, IRF referral patterns
Coverage325M+ patients (publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostEnterprise license; pricing by quoteEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessEnterprise API; not public— (not publicly disclosed)
Source provenanceProprietary claims linkage; methodology not publicly documentedClaims-based; methodology not publicly documented
Primary use caseBroad RWE, payer analytics, specialty market sizing across all care settingsPost-acute referral analytics, SNF/HH/hospice market intelligence, sales territory planning in post-acute
PricingBy quote; pricing not publicBy quote; pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Komodo Health

Use Komodo Health when the scope spans all care settings — acute, ambulatory, behavioral, post-acute — and the work requires a unified patient journey across the full continuum.

https://www.komodohealth.com →

When to use Trella Health

Use Trella Health when the focus is specifically post-acute — understanding SNF referral patterns, home health agency market share, or hospice census trends for a regional sales or strategy team.

https://www.trellahealth.com →

FAQ

Common questions

Is Trella Health part of Komodo Health?
No. As of this writing, Trella Health and Komodo Health are separate companies. Trella Health operates as an independent post-acute analytics platform.
Which platform is better for post-acute care analytics?
Trella Health is purpose-built for post-acute analytics — SNF, home health, hospice referral tracking is its core product. Komodo Health covers post-acute as part of its broader claims graph but is not optimized for that segment specifically.
What federal data covers the post-acute space?
CMS Care Compare publishes facility-quality data for nursing homes, home health agencies, and hospices — all free and publicly downloadable quarterly. CMS PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) provides daily staffing data for SNFs. These are the federal primary sources underlying commercial post-acute analytics.
Can post-acute claims data be reproduced without a vendor?
Not directly — claims data requires payer partnerships and is proprietary. However, CMS publishes provider-level utilization aggregates through the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data program, and facility-level quality data through Care Compare. These are free, reproducible starting points for post-acute research.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Drop our MCP server into Claude Desktop or call the API with pk_dx_sample. No signup. No credit card. Live demo key.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
48reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures