Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare vs Komodo Health: Side-by-Side Comparison

Definitive Healthcare and Komodo Health are both enterprise healthcare data platforms, but with different core assets. Definitive Healthcare leads with facility intelligence, technology-install data, and executive contacts. Komodo Health leads with a longitudinal patient claims graph across 325 million patients. The two often appear on the same enterprise shortlists.

Dimension by dimension

Definitive Healthcare vs Komodo Health, across 8 dimensions

DimensionDefinitive HealthcareKomodo Health
Data typeFacility intelligence, technology installs, executive contacts, claims-enriched provider profilesLongitudinal patient claims graph — 325M+ patients (publicly disclosed); real-world evidence analytics
Coverage— (not publicly disclosed)325 million patients (publicly disclosed by Komodo)
Refresh cadence— (not publicly disclosed)— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostEnterprise license; pricing by quoteEnterprise license; pricing by quote
API accessEnterprise API for customers; not a public open APIEnterprise API for customers; not a public open API
Source provenanceProprietary aggregation; field-level source lineage not publicly documentedClaims-based; patient-level linkage methodology proprietary
Primary use caseCommercial go-to-market: sales territory planning, facility targeting, exec contact dataReal-world evidence, payer analytics, specialty market sizing, longitudinal patient journeys
PricingBy quote; third-party reports cite five- to six-figure annual licensesBy quote; pricing not publicly posted

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Definitive Healthcare

Use Definitive Healthcare when the work is commercial go-to-market for healthcare organizations — territory planning, facility-technology install targeting, or executive outreach. Its facility and technology-layer data is the reference for commercial teams.

https://www.definitivehc.com →

When to use Komodo Health

Use Komodo Health when the work requires longitudinal patient-journey analysis, real-world evidence generation, or payer-facing analytics. Its claims graph at 325M patient scale is its differentiator.

https://www.komodohealth.com →

FAQ

Common questions

Do Definitive Healthcare and Komodo Health compete directly?
They overlap in healthcare enterprise data but serve different primary buyers. Definitive Healthcare targets commercial and go-to-market teams; Komodo Health targets real-world evidence, payer analytics, and clinical research teams. Many enterprises use both.
Which platform has better provider-level data?
Both platforms include provider data, but from different angles. Definitive Healthcare builds provider profiles from claims and commercial sources with a go-to-market frame; Komodo Health builds patient-encounter graphs that also surface provider activity. For primary-source federal provider records — NPI, enrollment, exclusion status — CMS NPPES, PECOS, and OIG LEIE are the authoritative inputs, and both platforms ingest from them.
Are coverage and pricing for these platforms publicly documented?
Neither Definitive Healthcare nor Komodo Health publicly posts their pricing. Coverage metrics are disclosed selectively in press materials — Komodo Health's 325M patient figure is publicly cited; Definitive Healthcare's comparable patient or provider counts are not publicly detailed. Cells marked '—' reflect this.
What is the difference between claims data and federal provider data?
Claims data (the basis of both Komodo Health and much of Definitive Healthcare) is derived from insurance billing records — it captures encounters but is proprietary and cannot be independently recreated. Federal provider data (NPPES, PECOS, OIG LEIE, Care Compare) is published directly by CMS and other agencies, carries explicit redistribution rights, and can be independently reproduced and cited.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Drop our MCP server into Claude Desktop or call the API with pk_dx_sample. No signup. No credit card. Live demo key.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
48reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures