Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Care Compare / Nursing Homes / Georgia / College Park
Fonteum Care Compare · Georgia · College Park

Nursing homes in College Park, Georgia: 1 Medicare-certified facility.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, and ownership type for every Medicare-certified nursing home in College Park — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset (4pq5-n9py).

Average CMS overall rating in College Park: 1.0 / 5

View at Medicare.gov →All Georgia cities →
Snapshot May 6, 2026·1 Medicare-certified nursing homes in College Park, Georgia·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info (4pq5-n9py)·State overview →·Module overview →·Methodology →
How College Park compares

College Park vs the Georgia state average

Overall ★ — this city
1.0
State avg 2.7 / 5
-1.7 vs state
Staffing ★ — this city
1.0
State avg 2.3 / 5
-1.3 vs state
Facilities — this city
1
356 statewide

State averages are CMS-published per-state means from the same snapshot; the city figure is the mean across the 1 rated facility above.

Where College Park sits

All 1 Medicare-certified nursing home in College Park sit in Fulton County, Georgia. County is the geographic unit CMS uses for staffing-desert and access analysis.

All Medicare-certified nursing homes in College Park, Georgia

Healthcare At College Park, Llc
1765 Temple Avenue · CCN 115579 · For profit - Limited Liability company
100 certified beds · QM Not rated · Last standard survey August 12, 2024
1
Overall
1
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Reading the data

What these CMS ratings mean

Every star column on this page comes straight from CMS’s Five-Star Quality Rating System. Fonteum re-publishes the federal numbers without re-scoring them — the definitions below are CMS’s, not ours.

Overall star rating
A 1-to-5 summary CMS derives from the health-inspection, staffing, and quality-measure ratings. It is a relative ranking, not an absolute score — roughly the top fifth of facilities earn 5 stars and the bottom fifth earn 1.
Health inspection rating
Based on the three most recent state standard surveys plus any complaint investigations, weighted toward recency. More and more severe deficiencies lower the rating.
Staffing rating
Built from payroll-based (PBJ) nurse staffing hours per resident day, case-mix adjusted, including registered-nurse hours and weekend coverage.
Quality-measure (QM) rating
Drawn from a set of MDS- and claims-based clinical measures (e.g. pressure ulcers, falls, hospitalisation, antipsychotic use) across short- and long-stay residents.
Special Focus Facility (SFF)
A separate CMS program flagging facilities with a persistent pattern of serious health-inspection problems. “SFF” marks an active designation; “SFF Candidate” marks a facility on the candidate list.

Full methodology: how Fonteum sources and signs CMS nursing-home data.

Other Georgia cities with nursing homes

Compare College Park with nearby markets — facility counts from the same CMS snapshot.

Atlanta20Macon12Augusta10Rome8Columbus7Marietta7Savannah7Decatur6Athens5Carrollton4Gainesville4Lawrenceville4

Fonteum research on nursing-home quality

Star ratings vs actual resident harm
Where CMS overall stars diverge from documented harm-level deficiencies.
Nursing-home staffing deserts by county
Counties where reported nurse hours per resident day fall furthest behind.
Nursing-home ownership networks
How chain ownership concentrates across Medicare-certified facilities.
Facilities banned from new Medicare admissions
Payment-denial enforcement actions and the facilities they hit.

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
48reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures