Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Care Compare / Nursing Homes / Arkansas / Fort Smith
Fonteum Care Compare · Arkansas · Fort Smith

Nursing homes in Fort Smith, Arkansas: 7 Medicare-certified facilities.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, and ownership type for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Fort Smith — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset (4pq5-n9py).

Average CMS overall rating in Fort Smith: 2.8 / 5

View at Medicare.gov →All Arkansas cities →
Snapshot May 6, 2026·7 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Fort Smith, Arkansas·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info (4pq5-n9py)·State overview →·Module overview →·Methodology →
How Fort Smith compares

Fort Smith vs the Arkansas state average

Overall ★ — this city
2.8
State avg 3.4 / 5
-0.6 vs state
Staffing ★ — this city
3.3
State avg 3.2 / 5
+0.1 vs state
Facilities — this city
7
221 statewide

State averages are CMS-published per-state means from the same snapshot; the city figure is the mean across the 7 rated facilities above.

Where Fort Smith sits

All 7 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Fort Smith sit in Sebastian County, Arkansas. County is the geographic unit CMS uses for staffing-desert and access analysis.

All Medicare-certified nursing homes in Fort Smith, Arkansas

Chapel Ridge Health And Rehab
4623 Rogers Ave · CCN 045364 · For profit - Limited Liability company
74 certified beds · 69 avg daily residents · 4.79 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 5 / 5 · Last standard survey May 8, 2025
4
Overall
4
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Fianna Hills Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
8411 South 28th Street · CCN 045354 · For profit - Limited Liability company
102 certified beds · 94.7 avg daily residents · 4.45 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 3 / 5 · Last standard survey June 5, 2025
3
Overall
3
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Covington Court Health And Rehabilitation Center
4500 Old Greenwood Rd · CCN 045363 · For profit - Limited Liability company
140 certified beds · 131 avg daily residents · 4.15 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 3 / 5 · Last standard survey August 1, 2024
3
Overall
4
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Methodist Health And Rehab
7425 Euper Lane · CCN 045413 · Non profit - Corporation
145 certified beds · 125 avg daily residents · 5.07 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 4 / 5 · Last standard survey October 24, 2024
3
Overall
3
Staffing
3 / 5
Health Insp.
Legacy Health And Rehabilitation Center
3310 North 50th Street · CCN 045267 · For profit - Limited Liability company
115 certified beds · 107.1 avg daily residents · 3.88 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 2 / 5 · Last standard survey January 31, 2025
2
Overall
4
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
The Blossoms At Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing Center
5301 Wheeler Avenue · CCN 045345 · For profit - Partnership
130 certified beds · 117.7 avg daily residents · 3.19 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM 4 / 5 · Last standard survey September 19, 2025
2
Overall
2
Staffing
2 / 5
Health Insp.
Brooken Hill Health And Rehab, Llc
9000 Hwy 71 South · CCN 045479 · For profit - Limited Liability company
125 certified beds · 94.6 avg daily residents · 6.26 total nurse hrs/resident-day · QM Not rated · Last standard survey September 17, 2024
—
Overall
—
Staffing
Not rated
Health Insp.
Reading the data

What these CMS ratings mean

Every star column on this page comes straight from CMS’s Five-Star Quality Rating System. Fonteum re-publishes the federal numbers without re-scoring them — the definitions below are CMS’s, not ours.

Overall star rating
A 1-to-5 summary CMS derives from the health-inspection, staffing, and quality-measure ratings. It is a relative ranking, not an absolute score — roughly the top fifth of facilities earn 5 stars and the bottom fifth earn 1.
Health inspection rating
Based on the three most recent state standard surveys plus any complaint investigations, weighted toward recency. More and more severe deficiencies lower the rating.
Staffing rating
Built from payroll-based (PBJ) nurse staffing hours per resident day, case-mix adjusted, including registered-nurse hours and weekend coverage.
Quality-measure (QM) rating
Drawn from a set of MDS- and claims-based clinical measures (e.g. pressure ulcers, falls, hospitalisation, antipsychotic use) across short- and long-stay residents.
Special Focus Facility (SFF)
A separate CMS program flagging facilities with a persistent pattern of serious health-inspection problems. “SFF” marks an active designation; “SFF Candidate” marks a facility on the candidate list.

Full methodology: how Fonteum sources and signs CMS nursing-home data.

Other Arkansas cities with nursing homes

Compare Fort Smith with nearby markets — facility counts from the same CMS snapshot.

Little Rock15Hot Springs8Rogers7Springdale6Conway5El Dorado5Fayetteville5North Little Rock5Benton4Jonesboro4Batesville3Cabot3

Fonteum research on nursing-home quality

Star ratings vs actual resident harm
Where CMS overall stars diverge from documented harm-level deficiencies.
Nursing-home staffing deserts by county
Counties where reported nurse hours per resident day fall furthest behind.
Nursing-home ownership networks
How chain ownership concentrates across Medicare-certified facilities.
Facilities banned from new Medicare admissions
Payment-denial enforcement actions and the facilities they hit.

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
48reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures